There may be a need to keep a careful watch over the activities of the
Election Commission that is planning to bring in e-voting. Already, the
electronic voting machines have "security" through "obscurity". Those
who developed the EVMs claim that the device is very secure, but we have
to take their word for granted, and there has been no public disclosure
about the technical aspects of its security. Internet based e-voting is
more dangerous given the element of secrecy ingrained in the political
process.
The paper ballot is the only secure, workable and verifiable solution
for a secret ballot.
If people seriously desire to use Internet or other electronic devices
for counting votes, then they should reform the electoral process so
that the element of "secrecy" in voting is taken away, introducing the
open ballot system. There is nothing wrong in voting openly. What does
the voting electorate have to fear: that goons will wait over their
shoulders and victimise if they don't vote in their favour? That cannot
be a reason because political parties, and their agents openly declare
their idealogies, and seem to be doing well in our country, and don't
seem to be suffering any such dangers. Getting open about our voting
preferences is needed to enable voting accountable though electronic
means that work better with openness. The minute the voter declares his
vote openly at the booth, the agents can count, and supervise the
electronic registers. It will also do away with "invalid votes". Open
ballot alone can bring in accountability for electronic voting methods -
evm's, internet or anything else that cannot possibly leave a "secure"
trail behind. If bringing in openness in voting is not liked, then
there is point in using evms or internet to count votes.
BTW, "e-vot-ing" in Tamil, means chasing away e's (flies :) in jobless
idling, and e-voting is sure to be a pointless idle exercise in
frustration, with none knowing how it helps. e-voting sometimes has a
close connection with "e-mailing" also :)