Sasi Sir, Reply to the list.
2009/1/3 V. Sasi Kumar sasi.fsf@gmail.com:
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 09:16 +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
2009/1/2 V. Sasi Kumar sasi.fsf@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:14 +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
2009/1/1 V. Sasi Kumar sasi.fsf@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 13:04 +0530, sandeep sr wrote:
The attempts to organize a local FSF chapter in TN without the consent of the Board Members, the Kochi conference, and the latest reports ... may be the 'hijack' theory was not entirely baseless.
I don't think it is easy to hijack the FS movement. The move to start an FSF chapter in Chennai was probably the act of some misguided supporters of the party.
<snip>
Read your statement again and see if I am putting statements in your mouth or you have just written what was in your mind. "I don't think it is easy to hijack the FS movement." What does this statement mean Sasi Sir?
I did not know that it meant that I was introducing a hijack theory. I thought I was responding to a suggestion that there really was a hijack theory. I suppose you did not read the rest of my statement.
Not 'introducing' but repeating. Read your previous mails on the same subject on other threads.
2009/1/3 Vikram Vincent vincentvikram@gmail.com:
Sasi Sir, Reply to the list.
I just saw your second mail to the list.