On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Nidhin Sasi nidhin.sasi@gmail.com wrote:
the Govt as per my knowledge till now (from the Top now from the Bottom).
So you want us to believe that all decisions that *Top* took, was on its own without being influenced by anyone associated with FS ? Or does it extend still further - whereby all such Governments, constituted by elected representatives, comes into existence without any assistance or linkages with *Bottom* ? Or does it convey that *Top* should be taken for granted for taking such ethical stand on its own, and hence should not be criticised anymore, nor should anyone try to snatch credit for decisions that *Top* took on its own ? Or should we accept that even when *Top* is constitutionally obliged to represent *Bottom*, *Bottom* should be seen as something very distinct from *Top*, and that they are not the same ? I fail to see the sharp distinctions in such objects that you portray, for me, they are very blurred. May be problems with my vision. CK Raju