On Friday 03 December 2004 08:40, Srinivasan Krishnan wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 06:28, risqer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is Qt free now, I mean"free as in speech" ?
>
> Dual licenced - GPL/QPL (QT Public licence, akin to the GPL) for
> GPL'd apps, and commercial seat based licencing for commercial
wrong terminology. U presume that GPL'd software are not commercial.GPLd applications can be very commercial. The right terminology would be "non GPL'd".
This isn't the first time that an incorrect / misleading statement about GPL / commercial software has appeared on the list. Please take care not to mislead.
> apps. Check their website for details.
>From one of their PRs
"As before, any user who wishes to create proprietary or closed source software must first purchase a development license from Trolltech."
rgds
jtd