>>> I find both YUM and Pirut quite slow as compared to APT and
>>> Synaptic. I don't think this has anything to do with my Internet
>>> connection, since I have used APT (and Synaptic) on the very same
>>> machine and connection as YUM and Pirut. Is this really an issue
>>> with YUM?
>>
>> With Yum IMO. Pirut uses Yum.
> Thats right. Rohan, yes, yum is pretty slow compared to apt. Why dont
> you install apt for fedora?
When I first started this thread few days back, my objective was not
to find a faster alternative for YUM on Fedora. I had been using
Synaptic and APT on Fedora Core 2, but stopped doing so after
upgrading to FC5. Partly due to my laziness, and partly due to the
fact that I read APT support will slowly be discontinued in Fedora.
After all if YUM is being promoted (Pirut was written for YUM
replacing system-config-packages) by the Fedora Project, it should
have something in it after all.
What I would like to know is WHY YUM is slower than APT is at all it is.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
,= ,-_-. =.
((_/)o o(\_))
`-'(. .)`-'
\_/