3 Jan
2011
3 Jan
'11
12:07 p.m.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 17:21 +0530, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote:
2011/1/3 Kenneth Gonsalves lawgon@thenilgiris.com:
An interesting thing is the so-called dual-licensed projects. Having
a
'community' edition with limited functionality to serve a bait to
buy
the 'full version' which is proprietary. This is usually a massive
con
job. And strangely enough 99% of dual licensed projects use the GPL.
I
wonder why.
Could you give a few examples? The ones I have used have full-featured open-source editions.
zimbra
--
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
Coimbatore LUG rox
http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/