On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:04:02PM +0530, Rony wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 08:34 PM, Gaurav Paliwal wrote:
-- With Regards, Gaurav Paliwal http://gauravpaliwal.com/blog -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMl3gSAAoJECoIdN941HMN12oIAMH5Ap9APFoHJFcjc/O4gzHY 3QSybvT2LfaJcKlmC88wwkf5flwGRuaO+fnZbneF2bTiR4mkMiWDL5TWdZO+XNsq 3Kkbv2Q8V9T5dQpbBbMzFIQYovElavJNgzfu7ZdRdXBkAjdeeWJdFWigjQ85M8Aw 9z6fwpq/XwiANZRAUIPNgTME4L5gWc7crGI3c/21XftrzfC4MTbHknLsQd1H2+JC BjVpg3rL1FbWIohQz1hIcA4FMRbL8ZjVLKEFrzfm08qKXURl1pBJtoXzJzr41xDB I5hhoL40HZ/dwSZNuY8eDtm9cSCY28ktQ14EM1bZYYB0l4i0muXIv+WixVZUluU= =Hol7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I am just curious to know the advantage of using the PGP signature. Does it authenticate you better or result in no bouncing or rejection of mails by spam guards? Suppose I copy and paste the text in a fake email like the one below, I will appear to have the same authentic signature. So what is the safety or advantage?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMl3gSAAoJECoIdN941HMN12oIAMH5Ap9APFoHJFcjc/O4gzHY 3QSybvT2LfaJcKlmC88wwkf5flwGRuaO+fnZbneF2bTiR4mkMiWDL5TWdZO+XNsq 3Kkbv2Q8V9T5dQpbBbMzFIQYovElavJNgzfu7ZdRdXBkAjdeeWJdFWigjQ85M8Aw 9z6fwpq/XwiANZRAUIPNgTME4L5gWc7crGI3c/21XftrzfC4MTbHknLsQd1H2+JC BjVpg3rL1FbWIohQz1hIcA4FMRbL8ZjVLKEFrzfm08qKXURl1pBJtoXzJzr41xDB I5hhoL40HZ/dwSZNuY8eDtm9cSCY28ktQ14EM1bZYYB0l4i0muXIv+WixVZUluU= =Hol7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Kindly start a seperate thread for this as it is not relevant to the topic under discussion.