hi,
an interesting discussion took place on IRC today regarding this: http://www.space-kerala.org/downloads/foss.pdf
The question was, with regard to #2 on the list - software developed by keltron, is it foss or not? My contention is that the tools used are irrelevant. The software was paid for by the government, and developed by the government, all using our tax rupees. But there is no indication whether the source for the application is open or not, available to the users or not, modifiable, downloadable or redistributable or not. Therefore this is not f/oss as it goes against the fundamental notion that software should be freely available, downloadable, modifiable and redistributeable with or without modifications. I was further of the opinion that the authors of the PDF in question have tried to give an impression that free software is flourishing in the state. I am also suprised that Richard Stallman has lent his name to this - I am quite sure that he would have opposed the same thing tooth and nail if it had happened in the US or Europe. However the free software guru with whom I was debating seemed to thing that this did not fall under the definition of proprietary software. Opinions anyone?