27 Nov
2011
27 Nov
'11
7:06 p.m.
On 28 November 2011 00:16, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) dineshah@gmail.com wrote:
(b)
improve those stretches to eliminate the accident-causing factors. Since banning is still not an option, you will turn to the latter.
Why can the same argument apply to nuclear technology?
Yes please. Go ahead an make the argument. Not the Kalam-esque "Koodankulam is absolutely safe because I say so", but an argument based on objective thought.
To start you off, here is a list of reasons why people don't want the Koodankulam plant. You can ignore the procedural/administrative ones in your first draft, and focus on the technical objections.
http://www.transcend.org/tms/2011/08/thirteen-reasons-why-we-do-not-want-the...
Binand