Morning Sir,
--- Devdas Bhagat devdas@dvb.homelinux.org wrote:
Those who do not understand TCP...
[snip]
Thanks Devdas for having enlightened us.
If you need reliability, use TCP. If you need performance, and can sacrifice reliability, use UDP. If you want both, buy more bandwidth, and sign a SLA with your provider for the reliability.
[snip]
Devdas, the issue is not about SLA's not about B/W and not about reliability atleast for now. We are discussing on getting the max throput thro either TCP-UDP. Post having achieved the same reliability-scalability-redundancy-performance-cpu consumption need to be looked into. We are in a phase where these protocols are being stressed on various OS stacks.
I assume you are smart enough to have gorged enough of TCP/IP through your career. You may not necessarily want to help but please understand the objective before you make such comments. Atleast i do feel you came across in an uncouth manner.
Have a great day Mr. Bhagat.
Trevor
Devdas Bhagat
|------|____________________________________|------| ( >- / Scaling FreeSoftware & OpenSource \ -< ) /~\ / In the Enterprise \ /~\ | ) \ | www.fsf.org | www.opensource.org | / (/ | |_|_ ____________________________________/ _|_|
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com