On 8/21/07, Raj Mathur raju@linux-delhi.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:52, Vivek J. Patankar wrote:
Mohan Nayaka wrote:
Does anyone know any DNS servers better than MTNL's?
I don't know if these are better, but they work for me without any trouble.
202.56.230.5 202.56.240.5
202.56.240.5 works for me: it is as good as mtnl's primary dns (203.94.227.70) and twice as good as mtnl's sec.
neo@ZION:~> ping 202.56.240.5 ... --- 202.56.240.5 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.520/15.738/15.957/0.251 ms neo@ZION:~> ping 203.94.227.70 ... --- 203.94.227.70 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.529/13.178/13.827/0.649 ms neo@ZION:~> ping 203.94.243.70 ... --- 203.94.243.70 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.889/32.763/33.638/0.893 ms
Those are Bharti (Airtel's) public DNS servers. I'd not recommend using them since one day Airtel may get a clue and stop them acting as public relays.
Hmm...