On Friday 25 November 2011 22:38:12 Rony wrote:
On 11/25/2011 08:39 PM, jtd@mtnl.net.in wrote:
On Friday 25 November 2011 18:40:32 Shamit Verma wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:30 PM, jtd@mtnl.net.in wrote:
As an interesting aside: The UIDAI specified error margins and duplicate verification system is such a hoot, that they cant even verify themselves how many false rejects or accepts are there. As per their specifications there will be well above 200 million duplicates or rejects, which translates to 200 million fakes - you dont know wether the Fprint is fake or the data is fake.
It is a start. Like any system, there would be technical failures which will have to be corrected.
Yes. Do it with your money, not with public money. And dont make utterly nonsensical claims. If you were a company (Read Infosys), making such claims, you would get sued proper. Infosys was sued by the S'pore government when they did this. Ofcourse such niceties skips the brainless UIDAI and their supporters.
The bad implementation of a good idea does not make the idea bad.
So what was wrong with the old system that this one corrects?