On Monday 29 Dec 2008 4:58:58 pm Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) wrote:
You completely misunderstand. Every company exists to provide a service. They MAY fail because of many reasons. But they WILL fail if they cannot provide the service that they propose in a satisfactory way.
Your argument can be used to validate the M$ success! Since M$ has not failed so far can lead to point where they can say that they are providing the products/services in satisfactorily.
that is what they said about enron and merill lynch - take it from me, M$ is on the long slippery slide downhill
Snip. As i said you really need to get the facts from some place other than wherever you are getting them from. Periodically we get thoroughly misinformed members on the list. However it has been sometime since the last one. Cant blame the poor members though, the disinformation from M$ and their puppets is huge and the poor reader thinks it's great marketing. If anything they are as terrible at marketing as they are at tech.
Isn't it strange that if someone don't agree with you are have views and opinions opposite ti you becomes M$ puppet?
he did not call them M$ puppets - he said they are misled by M$ and it's puppets
Why we never attempt to learn from our opponents?
what exactly do you suggest we learn from M$?
If our opponents are vastly successful does not always mean that they always employ unfair/illegal practices.
in the case of M$ it means precisely that.
They must be doing something right - like not berating and attack newbies with insults and creating an ecosystem which feed on each other, however flawed.
Actually *you* are the person who specialises in insults.