On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:10:11 +0530, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.joshi@gmail.com said:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 13:28 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:35:05 +0530, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.joshi@gmail.com said:
Fix your client for the last time or stop quoting me!
If you would point out what exactly is broken, I would be happy to oblige. Seems like my MUA is correctly generating the attribution.
If you think that "i++ + ++i" is a legal construct in standards conformant C, then people should stay away from wherever you learned the language.
Do you have the habit of not reading other peoples' posts completely and taking their statements out of context, twisting them?
Behold what I had written...
Yes, its undefined behavior.
yes, after going on and on about how it showed how operators worked, and how it was used to show students what is possible in C. It is, in fact, not possible to do this in C, but in some extended version loosely related to C implemented by the TC compiler.
manoj