27 Oct
2006
27 Oct
'06
2:49 a.m.
On 26-Oct-06, at 7:46 PM, jtd wrote:
even i know that. I was talking about the importance of a license being clear and simple. Which creative commons is and gpl v3 is not.
You cant have a simple licence.
you can - if the license is evolved in the foss way - as all the other licenses are evolving, and as far as i can see, getting more and more like each other. As i said before comparing the non- religious licenses to the GPL v3 is like comparing Linux to Hurd.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
lawgon@au-kbc.org
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/