On Monday 30 May 2005 20:23, Erle Pereira wrote:
Richard Chang wrote:
Ya Richard you got it finally (i hope) way to go. But the author apparently prefers to wear Horse blinkers.
Here it is why
the author of that article has got a rather one-sided view
And from the wrong end too. He's never heard about PDF. PDF is one of the standards in which to exchange documents. You do it by clicking an icon in openoffice. Do search for that feature in M$office. Will solve all problems of document exchange. Also the size of an Oo .sxw or sxc file is almost 1/3 of an M$ file. So why don't the bums in M$ spend some time to make their format similar to Oo. Besides it would become standards compliant. http://www.linuxworld.com/read/88713.htm
my reply in short ... ever tried to hit a moving target? Trying to make open-office write properly to a closed source format is definetly not very high on the list of things to do (and _should_ not be)
while on the subject perhaps Richard will care to point out a source for M$ doc file format and M$office APIs. To get an idea of what we are blabbing about visit the url. http://api.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList I do agree it's a different path from Richard's avowed noble goal of using without knowing how to. But nonetheless. He might also want to read (and inform the author too) http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-overview.html
It will acquaint both with the goals and objectives of the Oo team.
{ ...please lets not turn this thread into another philosophy debate.. i only replied b/c i felt a few imp. details were left out in the article. End this thread _here_
small correction Erle the most important points were left out in that article. This author has been publishing fud according to the folks on Groklaw. He had in the past published more balanced articles but seems to be going to the darkside. Perhaps a simple matter of Caviar and Champagne v/s freedom (yawn). Or maybe using without knowing as some love to say.
rgds jtd