On Tuesday 30 December 2008 19:20, Ravindra Jaju wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:16 PM, jtd jtd@mtnl.net.in wrote:
The "other" licence (PUEL) is definetly not FOSS. It is a closed personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license. Any use beyond the provisions of personal use is prohibited and you may not modify the product in any way.
1] The "other" license does not matter to "us" 2] The GPL'ed version is just that - FOSS
Hence, there's no problem discussing the GPL'ed VirtualBox on the list here. The proprietary version has some additional tools which Sun wishes to sell for a fee. I don't see any reason to dismiss VirtualBox just for that reason!
I think they are bundling additional features (or unbundling from the gpl package), rather than selling additional tools. Any way i thought Kartik was refering to the other (PUEL) licence and KG was dissing that.