23 Oct
2006
23 Oct
'06
5:08 p.m.
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:05, Rony wrote:
True but the corporate ones don't want to support the tally feature that allows manipulation of records.
Rony it is open source for crying out loud! It can be modified for minor changes!
Who will be doing the modifications? The original plan and as the subject line suggests, it has to be a tally alternative. If the tally part is kept optional under `do-it-yourself' open source, then its goes against the spirit of the project.
Regards,
Rony.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com