22 Dec
2006
22 Dec
'06
3:38 a.m.
Debarshi Ray wrote:
Reminds me of GNU Emacs. The same logic applies to it, after all it does many more things than OpenOffice.org. Many 'savvy' users do have a liking for it. Do you think it is 'good enough'?
What wrong did emacs do ? It is true that it can do many thing, but it doesnt necessarily mean that it needs to have anything. You can have things which you use in emacs and dont have those which yo do not use. Emacs is highly customizable to suit your needs. Also that emacs is not aimed at those who just want to use it as another notepad.
--
With Regards
Parthan (TechnoFreak)
. A Proud GNU/Linux User and Ubuntero
.0.
..0 [Web] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Parthan
000 [Blog]http://technofreakatchennai.wordpress.com