http://www.fossmeet.in/node/128
6th April 2008
This letter is to express our deep disappointment over your open support to the OOXML format forced through ISO by Microsoft. Being the top IT giants and thus the representatives of the IT industry in the country, it is a great shock to us that you do not stand with academia of the country and its representatives like the IITs, IIMs and IISc in supporting the Open Document Format (ODF) which is a true Free and Open Standard already recognised as an ISO Standard. Considering that a major portion of your employees come from such institutions, it is a wonder to us that you have decided to go ahead with this decisions. We would like to hear your explanation with respect to these points :-(quoted from www.noooxml.org/petition)
1. There is already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format (ODF): a dual standard adds costs, uncertainty and confusion to industry, government and citizens;
2. There is no provable implementation of the OOXML specification: Microsoft Office 2007 produces a special version of OOXML, not a file format which complies with the OOXML specification;
3. There is information missing from the specification document, for example how to do a ´autoSpaceLikeWord95´ or ´useWord97LineBreakRules´;
4. More than 10% of the examples mentioned in the proposed standard do not validate as XML;
5. There is no guarantee that anybody can write software that fully or partially implements the OOXML specification without being liable to patent lawsuits or patent license fees by Microsoft;
6. This format conflicts with existing ISO standards, such as ISO 8601 (Representation of dates and times), ISO 639 (Codes for the Representation of Names and Languages) or ISO/IEC 10118-3 (cryptographic hash);
7. There is a bug in the spreadsheet file format which forbids any date before the year 1900: such bugs affect the OOXML specification as well as software applications like Microsoft Excel 2000, XP, 2003 and 2007.
8. This standard proposal was not created by bringing together the experience and expertise of all interested parties (such as the producers, sellers, buyers, users and regulators), but by Microsoft alone.
With this decision, the impression you are making on your future employees in the academia is not a very pretty one. In fact, the development of OOXML receiving ISO´s approval has devalued our confidence in the standards setting process itself. We hope that you will put self-profit behind our country´s needs, change your decision, and stand with the rest of the country on this issue.
PS: Please forward this to the groups you are in...
Praveen A wrote:
http://www.fossmeet.in/node/128
6th April 2008
This letter is to express our deep disappointment over your open support to the OOXML format forced through ISO by Microsoft.
Did you send any copies to the head honchos of the respective companies?
This month's Chip magazine has an article on the 3 main OSes Windows, GNU/Linux and Mac OS X. The article gives higher points for internal security to Vista than GNU/Linux. I wrote to the sub editor and explained the FOSS side of things as he was used to the Windows way of things. I even posted links to the Vista court case and the emails pdf.
Next time they may be expected to have a better understanding of things.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Rony wrote:
| This month's Chip magazine has an article on the 3 main OSes Windows, | GNU/Linux and Mac OS X. The article gives higher points for internal | security to Vista than GNU/Linux. I wrote to the sub editor and | explained the FOSS side of things as he was used to the Windows way of | things. I even posted links to the Vista court case and the emails pdf.
http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200801070918.html is specific to RHEL/Fedora but does provide pointers to what to be considered for an assessment of security