<removed all previous posts> Please do not take this post as sarcasm. It is a contemplation of the thread. <begin> Perhaps, we have exercised our ``freedom of speech'', to the best of our abilities. There have been only arguments and no consensus on why 'GNU/Linux' or 'Linux'.
Let us give a new name based on Union in Set Theory in mathematics acceptable to both, GliNUx, *ONLY FOR THIS Mailing list* ;-)
-- http://360.yahoo.com/sriram4420
__________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
On 10/12/06, Roshan d_rosh2001@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Perhaps, we have exercised our ``freedom of speech'', to the best of our abilities. There have been only arguments and no consensus on why 'GNU/Linux' or 'Linux'.
Let us give a new name based on Union in Set Theory in mathematics acceptable to both, GliNUx, *ONLY FOR THIS Mailing list* ;-)
Isn't that what we've been trying to say all along - in some form or the other. Unfortunately, one side is desperately trying to reach an amicable inclusive settlement (atleast as far as this list is concerned), while the other refuses to budge or even recognize that there is a problem :-(
. farazs
On 12-Oct-06, at 10:22 AM, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
the other. Unfortunately, one side is desperately trying to reach an amicable inclusive settlement (atleast as far as this list is concerned), while the other refuses to budge or even recognize that there is a problem :-(
which is which?
On 10/12/06, Kenneth Gonsalves lawgon@au-kbc.org wrote:
On 12-Oct-06, at 10:22 AM, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
the other. Unfortunately, one side is desperately trying to reach an amicable inclusive settlement (atleast as far as this list is concerned), while the other refuses to budge or even recognize that there is a problem :-(
which is which?
Lol - it is clear from the context which someone seems to have forgetfully removed!!
Infact this is clearly indicative of the entire debate: people forgetting the context which enabled the creation of a system that they so proudly use and promote.
.farazs
On Thursday 12 October 2006 11:52, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 12-Oct-06, at 10:22 AM, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
the other. Unfortunately, one side is desperately trying to reach an amicable inclusive settlement (atleast as far as this list is concerned), while the other refuses to budge or even recognize that there is a problem :-(
which is which?
Take your pick. I am sure it's the one and not the other. Which is better than witch now getting into a twisted WGAi hunt.
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:22 +0530, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
On 10/12/06, Roshan d_rosh2001@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Perhaps, we have exercised our ``freedom of speech'', to the best of our abilities. There have been only arguments and no consensus on why 'GNU/Linux' or 'Linux'.
Let us give a new name based on Union in Set Theory in mathematics acceptable to both, GliNUx, *ONLY FOR THIS Mailing list* ;-)
Isn't that what we've been trying to say all along - in some form or the other. Unfortunately, one side is desperately trying to reach an amicable inclusive settlement (atleast as far as this list is concerned), while the other refuses to budge or even recognize that there is a problem :-(
. farazs
You know, after reading that entire thread, I can't help but think of - "We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile." - which until recently was used when referring to another OS.
Why not be really freedom loving and let each one call it what as it pleases them or haven't you heard that a rose by any other name has just as many thorns?
-gabin
-
Faraz Shahbazker -
Gabin Kattukaran -
jtd -
Kenneth Gonsalves -
Roshan