shouldnt it be "GNU/LINUX" Asia 07 ? i mean where is the credit to the community who developed the major portion of the entire thing ?
____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 20 January 2007 08:44 PM, Vivek R cobbled together some glyphs to say:
shouldnt it be "GNU/LINUX" Asia 07 ?
... in case you think LinuxAsia '07 is something dedicated to GNU, Linux, Software Freedom, sure. But in case of a purely commercial event sponsored by Micro$oft, may be not.
Regards, BG
- -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose@ubuntu.com Ubuntu -- Linux for Human Beings http://www.ubuntu.com/
1024D/86361B74 BB2C E244 15AD 05C5 523A 90E7 4249 3494 8636 1B74
On 1/20/07, Vivek R wrote:
shouldnt it be "GNU/LINUX" Asia 07 ? i mean where is the credit to the community who developed the major portion of the entire thing ?
Please don't start _that_ one again ;)
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:49:28 +0530 (IST), Philip Tellis said:
Sometime on Jan 20, Vivek R assembled some asciibets to say:
shouldnt it be "GNU/LINUX" Asia 07 ? i mean where is the credit to the community who developed the major
But GNU isn't a community. GNU is an (as yet incomplete) operating system.
I am not sure that is entirely accurate. There has long been a community effort around gcc, emacs, gas, bison -- long before there was Linux, actually, and even before BSD 4.4 lite was released. The FSF seeds various communities (FSF Europe, for one, comes to mind), which are fairly vibrant, and quite productive.
Unfortunately, the same can't be said of the HURD.
manoj
On 20-Jan-07, at 8:44 PM, Vivek R wrote:
shouldnt it be "GNU/LINUX" Asia 07 ? i mean where is the credit to the community who developed the major portion of the entire thing ?
omg