On Thursday 28 April 2005 16:43, Abhishek Daga wrote:
> --- sherlock(a)vsnl.com wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 April 2005 12:53, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 Apr 2005 1:49 am, Keith Fernandez wrote:
> > > > Disclaimer
> > > > information in this mail is confidential and is intended
> > > > solely for the addressee. Access to this mail by anyone else
> > > > is unauthorized. Any copying or further distribution beyond
> > > > the original recipient is not intended and may be unlawful.
> > > > The opinion expressed in this mail is that of the sender and
> > > > do not necessarily reflect that of Reliance"
> >
> > The last line is necessary methinks, considering various opinions
> > being expressed by members of Reliance, which of necessity do
> > not reflect those of the other opinions being so expressed.
> >
> > > please dont send me confidential mail - i cant be trusted
> >
> > That qualifies you as a recipient - you might even be invited to
> > express an opinion ;-)
> >
> > rgds
> > jtd
>
> haha..
> and ouch! that was way below the belt. i am sure many are squirming
> in their seats. and some in high offices.
> Schadenfreude. si?
Nope. But then some miseries naturally follow others - like opinions
following Reliance mcap which boils faster than oil prices from
40000 cr. to 100000 cr (at least in the press releases).
At this rate we should hand over ourselves the Ambanis who will have
eliminated poverty in a jiffy.
rgds
jtd